Balanced RFS Approach: Ethanol proponents saw no reason to reduce the blending rate when a drought caused corn prices to skyrocket and thus forced the adjustment to short supplies onto the livestock sector. Now the livestock sector has returned fire by supporting legislation that cap ethanol blends at 10 percent and end the corn ethanol mandate in 2014. Neither are balanced approaches. The correct answer is a countercyclical mandate that adjusts according to corn supplies, providing a price floor to corn growers and a price ceiling to livestock growers. Food versus fuel will continue to be a war until a more reasonable approach is taken.Symptoms Not Causes: Ross Korves of Truth About Trade correctly dissects the problem with India's "food...